Public Affairs Networking
‘Culture wars’ and globalisation fears causing Europe’s immigration backlash

The recent developments in Switzerland demonstrate the widespread popular concerns over globalisation, the potential impact of right-wing populist parties in many democracies and the culture wars dividing contemporary European society – writes Timo Lochocki

On February 9, a small majority of Swiss voters approved a proposal by the right-wing populist Swiss People’s Party – or SVP – to significantly limit migration inflows from other European countries. The Swiss vote garnered attention across Europe because it now requires the renegotiation of certain agreements between the European Union and Switzerland — a non-member — which had so far been ensured by bilateral treaties. The issues at stake are the free movement of goods, capital, services and, most importantly, people — the EU’s ‘four freedoms’. Based on the referendum, the number of Germans, French or Polish citizens allowed to migrate to Switzerland will be contingent on a quota system.

Another reason for the attention is that Europe is seeing the strongest voices of renationalisation since the foundation of the EU in 1992. The SVP’s success is, to date, the most remarkable manifestation of the potential impact of these political forces. The developments in Switzerland offer three crucial insights about the political development of the union and its member states.

The first lesson is that this episode is not about immigration per se, but about fears over globalisation. Survey data shows a clear rejection of immigration and multiculturalism by the 15 to 25 per cent of voters who constitute Europe’s right-conservative electorate. However, majorities in most societies are concerned with safeguarding cherished local and national customs that are supposedly under siege.

For this reason, the notions of open borders can be rejected by majorities of voters, as happened in the Swiss referendum. The 50 per cent who rejected immigration represented a wide range of voters: liberals and conservatives, urban and rural voters, men and women, and citizens with different levels of education. Studies even indicate that many Swiss voters with a left-liberal worldview approved of this one aspect of the right-conservative agenda.

Secondly, this is not about the particularities of the Swiss political system but about the potential of right-wing populist parties all over Europe. The SVP’s proposal to limit immigration through a nation-wide referendum was resisted by all other political forces, civil society actors such as churches, unions, and employer organisations – and most of the media. The SVP made use of its remarkable organisational capacity and campaigning skills to reach out far beyond its narrow electoral constituency.

The Swiss referendum shows that even while right-wing populist parties struggle to gain more but 30 per cent of votes in elections, they can set the national political agenda. Even though the aging societies of the continent are in need of skilled migration, substantial shares of European electorates sympathise with right-wing populism on this issue. This shows the constraints faced by established, moderate political forces when responding rationally to many contemporary challenges.

The third and final lesson is that it is not economic imbalances that are dividing electorates but culture wars. While some commentators have pointed to Swiss fears about increased economic competition due to migration, Switzerland’s extremely low unemployment figures and its remarkable growth rates since the 1990s run counter to these assumptions.

To the contrary, survey data suggests that fears over European integration and multiculturalism are significantly more widespread in countries with fewer economic concerns. Political competition in the prosperous nations of Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Austria and Switzerland is dominated by fierce conflicts between multiculturalism and renationalisation. Strong right-wing populist forces propel these debates and not only complicate the search for fruitful solutions but also weaken social ties domestically and across national borders.

The recent developments in Switzerland demonstrate the widespread popular concerns over globalisation, the potential impact of right-wing populist parties in many democracies and the culture wars dividing contemporary European society. All three phenomena constrain cooperation at the supranational level. And they show the possible repercussions for those seeking political solutions to achieving truly multicultural societies.

Timo Lochocki is a lecturer in comparative politics and migration at the Humboldt University of Berlin and a fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States think-tank. The GMFUS first published this article as part of its Transatlantic Takes series:
Three lessons from Switzerland’s immigration referendum

Comments
No comments yet
Submit a comment

Policy and networking for the digital age
Policy Review TV Neil Stewart Associates
© Policy Review | Policy and networking for the digital age 2017 | Log-in | Proudly powered by WordPress