Policy Review Magazine
Magazine Intelligence Interactive Policy Review TV Home Latest Issue Archive
Higher Education

Policy Tracker

Higher education framework and fees review

 

After nearly two years of discussion and delays, the Government’s “framework” for higher education has been published and a review of fees and student finance launched. Designed to set the context for the fees review, the framework maps out long-term ambitions for the sector and makes some new demands on universities, while warning of tough times ahead.


Higher Ambitions, the 120-page report that sets out the Government’s strategy, largely confirms the direction of recent policy. It declares UK higher education to be a “success story” and adds: “Over the last decade we have pursued the twin objectives of supporting excellence and widening access, and these have proved to be complementary and mutually reinforcing.”


However, the sub-title of the report, The future of universities in a knowledge economy, gives a clear indication of the priorities of Lord Mandelson and his Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (Bis). While the First Secretary has insisted since the publication of the report that there is no threat to the arts and humanities, or to “blue-skies” research, its emphasis is firmly on wealth-creation through science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM).


Commissioned by John Denham, as Universities Secretary, in February 2008, the review began with submissions by vice-chancellors and other representatives of the sector on nine themes, from teaching and the student experience to internationalisation, part-time students and e-learning. Commentators from outside the academic world added their views in a subsequent round of reports.


Publication of the Government’s conclusions had already been delayed when responsibility for higher education passed to Lord Mandelson’s new department. He took much of the summer and autumn to put his own stamp on the report, eventually separating it from the launch of the fees review, which has been given a deliberately broad remit.


 The framework proposals are divided into six areas:


Access


Standing by Tony Blair’s target of 50 per cent participation in higher education by the age of 30, the report calls for more progress on opening up access to leading universities.



Knowledge transfer



 


Research



Teaching



Local communities and the wider world



Maintaining excellence with tighter public funding



 Fees review


 Lord Browne of Madingley and his team of six will have up to a year to “analyse the challenges and opportunities facing higher education and their implications for student financing and support.” The review will cover full and part-time undergraduates and postgraduates, examining the balance of contributions to higher education funding by taxpayers, students, graduates and employers.


The review has been told to take into account:



The review members are:



 Next steps


To find out more about this article, visit: http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/higher-ambitions

Cover Story

Into the valley of death

Steve Smith fears that universities and the economy will be the losers if the coalition cannot agree on student fees
By John O'Leary

Feature Articles

Stick together to resist the axe

Even in an era of cuts, market forces must not be allowed to dictate students' choice of university
By Aaron Porter

Redefining the business model

Universities will have to re-examine every aspect of their operations - and the assumptions that underlie them
By Mike Boxall


Other articles

Social Policy

Crowd control

Public engagement with policymakers is a good thing. But don’t let the tools of engagement drive the process
By Pippa Hyam

Education and Skills

Strong foundations

Research into the effectiveness of early intervention programmes poses questions for the new Government
By Oli de Botton

Central Government

Mind your language

Government moves to cut jargon are well-meaning but must go further if they are to make a real impact
By Neil Taylor

The Economy

A taxing question

The Calman Commission’s fiscal recommendations will define its long-term success - or otherwise
By David Lee